Poker Economies of Scale

Date: 06/17/1998
From: Jim Geary
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker
Subject: Poker Economies of Scale - was Re: Poker vs Slots-A business decision

 On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Jeffrey B. Siegal wrote:
  
 > > someone else wrote:
 > > And most Vegas poker rooms are pretty pathetic affairs (Luxor/Excalibur
 > > et. al.), with the majority of tables empty even at peak times.
 > 
 > This is true.  The fact is that poker benefits from an economy of scale.  People
 > like to play where there are a variety of games, and several games going at the same
 > limit means less waiting.  It really doesn't make a lot of sense to have small poker
 > rooms with a handful of tables scattered all around town, and that's the way the
 > market is going.


 I've thought about this a bit and I agree but it brings up an
 interesting paradox.  Is it better to have just one big room
 in a metropolitan area?  The upside is that you'll always
 efficiently meet the general population's demand for games, so you won't
 have diffusion that hurts games in general.  The downside
 is of course the one casino will start feeling its monopolistic
 oats.
  
 In Phoenix, we used to have two casinos sixty miles apart, both
 in a sort of nowhere relative to most of the population.  Then
 a big casino opened up that was actually near a population center.
 All the action now concentrates there for the games I usually play
 (20-40 & 30-60).  Friday, a new casino is going to open up at an 
 even better location.  But I wonder: is this going to be good for
 me?  Only if all my games move there.  I just don't think
 that mid limit games will survive at two different casinos.
 When the #3 casino opened up, it was pretty clear where the action
 was going.  Now I don't know.  And this can't be good for the games if a
 regular player can't plan on when or where to show up.  I don't know. 
 Maybe there's always a transition period while the truth is discovered, we'll see.
  
 Anyway, after thinking about it, I venture that the best scenario is 
 one big casino that handles the majority of the business, and a few smaller
 casinos with lower-stakes games still nipping at their heels to keep them 
 honest.  Hmmm, kinda sounds like the OS/software industry...
  

Last Modified 2/9/00


Back to Poker Letters Page.

Back to Jim's Poker Page

Back to Jim's Main Page